Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction Update
- Vol. 10 (5) , 401-407
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh036
Abstract
Direct testing of the outcome of the first and second meiotic divisions has become possible with the introduction of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for aneuploidies. Testing of oocytes by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the first and second polar bodies showed that more than half of oocytes from the IVF patients aged 35 years and older had chromosomal abnormalities, which originated from errors in meiosis I or meiosis II, or both: 41.9% of oocytes were aneuploid after meiosis I and 37.3% aneuploid after meiosis II, with 29.1% of these oocytes having both meiosis I and meiosis II errors. As a result, one third of oocytes detected as normal after meiosis I contained the meiosis II errors, and two thirds of those with meiosis II errors were already abnormal following meiosis I. Although the rates of chromosomal abnormalities deriving from meiosis I and II were comparable, meiosis I errors predominantly resulted in extra chromosome (chromatid) material in oocytes, in contrast to a random distribution of extra and missing chromatids after meiosis II. The majority of meiosis I abnormalities were represented by chromatid errors, which seem to be the major source of chromosomal abnormalities in the resulting embryos. Approximately one third of aneuploid oocytes deriving from sequential errors in the first and second meiotic divisions resulted in a balanced karyotype, representing a possible phenomenon of “aneuploidy rescue” during the second meiotic division. However, the majority of the embryos resulting from such oocytes appeared to be abnormal for the same or different chromosome(s), or were mosaic, suggesting a possible predisposition of the resulting embryos to further mitotic errors. Although the origin of a high frequency of mosaicism at the cleavage stage is not sufficiently understood, the mosaic embryos may originate from the chromosomally abnormal oocytes, as a result of a “trisomy rescue” mechanism during the first mitotic divisions, which renders polar body FISH analysis to have important clinical value for reliable pre-selection of aneuploidy-free embryos for transfer.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidiesReproductive BioMedicine Online, 2003
- Sequential FISH analysis of oocytes and polar bodies reveals aneuploidy mechanismsPrenatal Diagnosis, 2003
- In Vitro Fertilization May Increase the Risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Related to the Abnormal Imprinting of the KCNQ1OT GeneAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Association of In Vitro Fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome and Epigenetic Alterations of LIT1 and H19American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertilityHuman Reproduction, 2002
- Mitochondrial DNA rearrangements in human oocytes and embryosMolecular Human Reproduction, 1999
- Microtubule and microfilament organization in maturing human oocytesHuman Reproduction, 1998
- Characterization of susceptible chiasma configurations that increase the risk for maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21Human Molecular Genetics, 1997
- Susceptible chiasmate configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non–disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis IINature Genetics, 1996
- Fertilization and early embryology: Influence of maternal age on meiotic spindle assembly oocytes from naturally cycling womenHuman Reproduction, 1996