Risk of hysterectomy after 1000 consecutive endometrial laser ablations
Open Access
- 19 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 105 (8) , 897-903
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10236.x
Abstract
ObjectivesTo determine the hysterectomy rate after endometrial laser ablation, allowing for variable follow up times, and to evaluate the factors that might predict outcome.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingSpecialist minimal access gynaecology unit in a district general hospital.MethodsData were obtained from case notes, theatre records, and follow up postal questionnaires. The risk of hysterectomy following endometrial laser ablation was assessed using survival curve estimates. Proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify the predictor(s) of this outcome.ResultsA single endometrial laser ablation was carried out on 746 patients (85.4%); 124 patients (14.2%) underwent one repeat procedure and three (0.4%)) underwent two repeat ablative procedures. The cumulative rate of return of the postal questionnaires was 87.3% (762/873 patients). Survival curve analysis showed that the overall hysterectomy rate projected over a follow up period of 6.5 years was 21% (95% CI 16%‐27%). The age of the patient at endometrial ablation, uterine cavity length, operative time, volume of fluid absorbed, the presence or absence of dysmenorrhoea, premenstrual syndrome and the method of endometrial preparation prior to surgery did not contribute significantly to the regression model. Having a repeat endometrial ablation procedure increased the risk of having a subsequent hysterectomy (RR = 2.93; 95% CI 1.59–5.40;P= 0.0015), whereas the presence of intrauterine pathology (eg, polyps, fibroids and uterine shape abnormalities) decreased the risk of this outcome (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.08–0.86;P= 0.0082) after adjustment for confounding due to patient's age and dysmenorrhoea prior to surgery.ConclusionsEndometrial laser ablation is a safe and effective treatment for menstrual dysfunction. Repeat ablative procedures significantly increased, and the presence of intrauterine pathology decreased, the risk of subsequent hysterectomy. variable follow up times, and to evaluate the factors that might predict outcome.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endometrial Resection for the Treatment of MenorrhagiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A comparison of goserelin and danazol as endometrial thinning agents prior to endometrial laser ablationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Endometrial ablation: A series of 568 patients treated over an 11-year periodAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Six Hundred Endometrial Laser AblationsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1995
- Trends in gynaecological surgeryThe Lancet, 1994
- Endometrial ablation in the treatment of menorrhagiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Randomised controlled trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of menorrhagiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- A multi‐centre collaborative study into the treatment of menorrhagia by Nd‐YAG laser ablation of the endometriumBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Transcervical resection of endometrium in women with menorrhagia.BMJ, 1989
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958