A randomized study of sequential versus alternating combination chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The concept of using either alternating or sequential combination chemotherapy with non-cross-resistant combinations was tested in a randomized trial including 301 previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The sequential schedule consisted of CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil) followed by PH (cisplatin, hexamethylmelamine) in nonresponders, CAF→ PH (n=157), and the alternating regimen consisted of CAF/PH (n = 144). With a median observation time of 54 months, no statistically significant differences were found between the pathologically complete response (PCR) rates of 17% and 16%, respectively, nor were there any statistical differences in median disease-free survival for PCR patients (CAF↑ PH 34+ months and CAF/PH 26+ months), in overall survival (28 and 24 months, respectively), or in time to treatment failure (10 and 11 months). The overall estimated cure rate was 13%. An equal degree of myelosuppression was seen with the two regimens, whereas neuro- and nephrotoxicity were more pronounced when PH was given sequentially to CAF than with the alternating schedule. We conclude that the sequential and the alternated use of doxorubicin- and platinum-based regimens yield equivalent results and that other approaches should be investigated to improve treatment effects.