CHOICE AND RATE OF REINFORCEMENT1,2
- 1 September 1969
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 12 (5) , 723-730
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723
Abstract
Pigeons' responses in the presence of two concurrently available (initial‐link) stimuli produced one of two different (terminal‐link) stimuli. The rate of reinforcement in the presence of one terminal‐link stimulus was three times that of the other. Three different pairs of identical but independent variable‐interval schedules controlled entry into the terminal links. When the intermediate pair was in effect, the pigeons distributed their (choice) responses in the presence of the concurrently available stimuli of the initial links in the same proportion as reinforcements were distributed in the mutually exclusive terminal links. This finding was consistent with those of earlier studies. When either the pair of larger or smaller variable‐interval schedules was in effect, however, proportions of choice responses did not match proportions of reinforcements. In addition, matching was not obtained when entry into the terminal links was controlled by unequal variable‐interval schedules. A formulation consistent with extant data states that choice behavior is dependent upon the amount of reduction in the expected time to primary reinforcement, as signified by entry into one terminal link, relative to the amount of reduction in expected time to reinforcement signified by entry into the other terminal link.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND NUMBER OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENTS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- EFFECTS OF REQUIRED RATES OF RESPONDING UPON CHOICE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- A METHOD FOR INCREASING THE REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE OF INTRACRANIAL STIMULATION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- THE EFFECT OF SHOCK INTENSITY ON CONCURRENT AND SINGLE‐KEY RESPONDING IN CONCURRENT‐CHAIN SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- PREFERENCE FOR MIXED‐ VERSUS FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE‐REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCYJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and PunishmentScience, 1963