Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Reviews of Geophysics
- Vol. 36 (4) , 441-500
- https://doi.org/10.1029/97rg03139
Abstract
Geophysical applications of radar interferometry to measure changes in the Earth's surface have exploded in the early 1990s. This new geodetic technique calculates the interference pattern caused by the difference in phase between two images acquired by a spaceborne synthetic aperture radar at two distinct times. The resulting interferogram is a contour map of the change in distance between the ground and the radar instrument. These maps provide an unsurpassed spatial sampling density (∼100 pixels km−2), a competitive precision (∼1 cm), and a useful observation cadence (1 pass month−1). They record movements in the crust, perturbations in the atmosphere, dielectric modifications in the soil, and relief in the topography. They are also sensitive to technical effects, such as relative variations in the radar's trajectory or variations in its frequency standard. We describe how all these phenomena contribute to an interferogram. Then a practical summary explains the techniques for calculating and manipulating interferograms from various radar instruments, including the four satellites currently in orbit: ERS‐1, ERS‐2, JERS‐1, and RADARSAT. The next chapter suggests some guidelines for interpreting an interferogram as a geophysical measurement: respecting the limits of the technique, assessing its uncertainty, recognizing artifacts, and discriminating different types of signal. We then review the geophysical applications published to date, most of which study deformation related to earthquakes, volcanoes, and glaciers using ERS‐1 data. We also show examples of monitoring natural hazards and environmental alterations related to landslides, subsidence, and agriculture. In addition, we consider subtler geophysical signals such as postseismic relaxation, tidal loading of coastal areas, and interseismic strain accumulation. We conclude with our perspectives on the future of radar interferometry. The objective of the review is for the reader to develop the physical understanding necessary to calculate an interferogram and the geophysical intuition necessary to interpret it.This publication has 157 references indexed in Scilit:
- Creep of rocksaltPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Correction to «Land subsidence caused by the East Mesa Geothermal Field, California, observed using SAR interferometry»Geophysical Research Letters, 1998
- Tropospheric corrections of SAR interferograms with strong topography. Application to EtnaGeophysical Research Letters, 1998
- Synthetic aperture radar interferogram of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake and its geodetic inversionGeophysical Research Letters, 1997
- Readjustment of the Krafla Spreading Segment to crustal rifting measured by satellite radar interferometryGeophysical Research Letters, 1997
- Observation and modelling of the Saint-Étienne-de-Tinée landslide using SAR interferometryTectonophysics, 1996
- The 1995 Grevena (northern Greece) Earthquake: Fault model constrained with tectonic observations and SAR interferometryGeophysical Research Letters, 1996
- Review Article SAR interferometry—issues, techniques, applicationsInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996
- Cover Three-dimensional digital elevation model of Mt Vesuvius from NASA/JPL TOPSARInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996
- Elevation changes in the central transverse ranges near Ventura, CaliforniaTectonophysics, 1975