The evaluation of the quality of research
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education
- Vol. 13 (1) , 45-57
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078812331377955
Abstract
This article discusses the contexts in which it is necessary to evaluate the quality of research, the determinants of quality, and how quality can be evaluated. This is a field in which there is now a very substantial literature, and most of the article summarises and discusses some of the main books and articles in the English language reporting research in this field, published up to October 1986, especially those which themselves summarise the research done in particular areas. Amongst the criteria for the evaluation of research that are discussed are peer review, numbers of publications, counts of citations, and the numbers and value of research grants.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesisResearch in Higher Education, 1986
- Misconduct in research: An issue of science policy and practiceMinerva, 1985
- Policies for responding to allegations of fraud in researchMinerva, 1985
- CERN: Past performance and future prospects: II. The scientific performance of the CERN acceleratorsResearch Policy, 1984
- Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical ReviewSocial Studies of Science, 1983
- Chance and Consensus in Peer ReviewScience, 1981
- The impact of the science research council's policy of selectivity and concentration on average levels of research support: 1965–1974Research Policy, 1981
- A quantitative analysis of the science research council's policy of “selectivity and concentration”Research Policy, 1979
- Chemists in British Universities: A Study of the Reward System in ScienceAmerican Sociological Review, 1973
- The Making of a ScientistNature, 1967