On Estimating the Reliability of Composite Indexes Through Factor Analysis
- 1 May 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 2 (4) , 485-510
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004912417400200405
Abstract
The rationale for Heise and Bohrnstedt's index of reliability, omega, is restated in terms of the models of classical measurement theory and factor analysis. Although omega is the best available internal-consistency estimate of reliability, its value is generally lower than a composite scale's true reliability in the classical measurement model. Under quite foreseeable circumstances, it may be appreciably lower. Some implications for forming indexes through factor analysis are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forming Composite Scales and Estimating Their Validity Through Factor AnalysisSocial Forces, 1974
- The Treatment of Unobservable Variables in Path AnalysisSociological Methodology, 1971
- A general method for analysis of covariance structuresBiometrika, 1970
- Cautions in Applying Various Procedures for Determining the Reliability and Validity of Multiple-Item ScalesAmerican Sociological Review, 1970
- Validity, Invalidity, and ReliabilitySociological Methodology, 1970
- A Quick Method for Determining the Reliability and Validity of Multiple-Item ScalesAmerican Sociological Review, 1969
- Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest CorrelationAmerican Sociological Review, 1969
- Coefficient Alpha and the Reliability of Composite MeasurementsPsychometrika, 1967
- Alpha Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1965
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951