How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
Open Access
- 13 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (12) , e28660
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028660
Abstract
A better understanding of the relationship between stand structure and productivity is required for the development of: a) scalable models that can accurately predict growth and yield dynamics for the world's forests; and b) stand management regimes that maximize wood and/or timber yield, while maintaining structural and species diversity. We develop a cohort-based canopy competition model (“CAIN”), parameterized with inventory data from Ontario, Canada, to examine the relationship between stand structure and productivity. Tree growth, mortality and recruitment are quantified as functions of diameter and asymmetric competition, using a competition index (CAIh) defined as the total projected area of tree crowns at a given tree's mid-crown height. Stand growth, mortality, and yield are simulated for inventoried stands, and also for hypothetical stands differing in total volume and tree size distribution. For a given diameter, tree growth decreases as CAIh increases, whereas the probability of mortality increases. For a given CAIh, diameter growth exhibits a humped pattern with respect to diameter, whereas mortality exhibits a U-shaped pattern reflecting senescence of large trees. For a fixed size distribution, stand growth increases asymptotically with total density, whereas mortality increases monotonically. Thus, net productivity peaks at an intermediate volume of 100–150 m3/ha, and approaches zero at 250 m3/ha. However, for a fixed stand volume, mortality due to senescence decreases if the proportion of large trees decreases as overall density increases. This size-related reduction in mortality offsets the density-related increase in mortality, resulting in a 40% increase in yield. Size-related variation in growth and mortality exerts a profound influence on the relationship between stand structure and productivity. Dense stands dominated by small trees yield more wood than stands dominated by fewer large trees, because the relative growth rate of small trees is higher, and because they are less likely to die.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structural changes and potential vertebrate responses following simulated partial harvesting of boreal mixedwood standsForest Ecology and Management, 2011
- Influences of Forest Structure, Climate and Species Composition on Tree Mortality across the Eastern USPLOS ONE, 2010
- The relationship between wood density and mortality in a global tropical forest data setNew Phytologist, 2010
- Long-term snag and downed woody debris dynamics under periodic surface fire, fire suppression, and shelterwood managementCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2009
- Predicting and understanding forest dynamics using a simple tractable modelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Volume increment efficiency of Picea mariana in northern Ontario, CanadaForest Ecology and Management, 2008
- Understanding height-structured competition in forests: is there anR*for light?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree SpeciesPLOS ONE, 2007
- Cavity tree occurrence in hardwood forests of central OntarioForest Ecology and Management, 2007
- Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forestsForest Ecology and Management, 2006