Factors Affecting Outcome and Predictability of Radial Keratotomy in the PERK Study
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 105 (1) , 42-51
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010048030
Abstract
• The Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study used a standardized surgical technique that included a central clear zone with a diameter of 4.0, 3.5, or 3.0 mm. Multiple regression analysis of the outcome in one eye from each of 411 patients disclosed that the diameter of the central clear zone, patient age, and depth of the incision scar were the major factors affecting the change in refraction one year after surgery. Preoperative factors examined that did not have a significant influence on the outcome were sex, average central keratometric power, corneal thickness, corneal diameter, intraocular pressure, and ocular rigidity. The predictability of radial keratotomy, ie, the precision with which the outcome can be estimated, was measured by the 90% confidence interval for the change in refraction based on the regression equation. The width of this interval within each clear zone group was as follows: 4.0 mm, 2.49 diopters; 3.5 mm, 3.38 D; 3.0 mm, 4.12 D. For all 411 eyes, the 90% confidence interval was approximately 3.50 D wide. Thus, the surgeon could be 90% certain that an individual patient's refraction would be within 1.75 D of the predicted value one year after surgery.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraocular PressurePublished by Qeios Ltd ,2020
- Factors Affecting Predictability of Radial KeratotomyOphthalmology, 1985
- Review: The Changing Status of Radial Keratotomy for Myopia. Part IIJournal of Refractive Surgery, 1985
- A Study of Optical Zone Size and Incision Redeepening in Experimental Radial KeratotomyArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1985
- Thornton Guide for Radial Keratotomy Incisions and Optical Zone SizeJournal of Refractive Surgery, 1985
- Evaluating the Predictability of Radial KeratotomyOphthalmology, 1985
- Radial keratotomy: A comprehensive evaluationDocumenta Ophthalmologica, 1984
- Comparison of Two Methods of Marking the Visual Axis on the Cornea During Radial KeratotomyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1983
- Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial KeratotomyArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1983
- A Statistical Analysis of Radial Keratotomy in Human Cadaver EyesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1981