Subordination and linguistic complexity
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 15 (1) , 117-131
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544804
Abstract
Subordination is frequently used as a measure of language complexity in educational and linguistic research. This article demonstrates, however, that in spoken discourse many clauses introduced by “subordinating conjunctions” are not actually subordinate, whether subordination is considered a structural concept (the embedding of one clause within another) or an informational construct (main vs. subordinate ideas). This analysis suggests that the study of linguistic complexity must be informed by studies of spoken as well as written discourse and take account of the cultural and situational contexts of language use.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Linguistic Relationships of Spoken and Written Nukulaelae RegistersLanguage, 1988
- Towards a typology of clause linkagePublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1988
- Repetition in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of TalkLanguage, 1987
- CONDITIONALS IN DISCOURSE: A TEXT-BASED STUDY FROM ENGLISHPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- Spoken and Written Textual Dimensions in English: Resolving the Contradictory FindingsLanguage, 1986
- Language and SchoolingSociology of Education, 1984
- CAUSAL LINKING IN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN ENGLISHStudia Linguistica, 1984
- Ways with WordsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983
- Structuring School StructureHarvard Educational Review, 1978
- Some Observations concerning Subordinate Clauses in EnglishLanguage, 1970