The Interpretation of Recovery Stages in Irradiated Metals
- 1 January 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Physica Status Solidi (b)
- Vol. 17 (1) , 361-373
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19660170141
Abstract
Recent experiments suggest that in stages I and II bound Frenkel pairs only anneal. Such an interpretation leads to the following model: a vacancy and an interstitial form a bound Frenkel pair when their separation is less than about 10 lattice constants. The pairs which anneal above stage I are produced by multiple displacements or focused replacement sequences, and all pairs arising from defocused single displacements anneal in stage I. Secondary pairs (with partners from different damage events) produce effects similar to those expected from a freely migrating interstitial. A consistent interpretation of the recovery in Au, Cu, and Al can be given in this way.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dose dependence of the annealing stage II in neutron irradiated aluminumPhysics Letters, 1966
- Determination of stage I recovery in pure aluminum following electron irradiationPhysics Letters, 1965
- On the interpretation of stage I recovery after electron irradiation of copperPhysics Letters, 1965
- Concentration Dependence of Stage I Annealing in Irradiated CopperPhysical Review B, 1965
- Stored-Energy Release Below 80°K in Deuteron-Irradiated CopperPhysical Review B, 1965
- LOW-TEMPERATURE NEUTRON IRRADIATION DAMAGE IN ALUMINUM AND GOLDCanadian Journal of Physics, 1964
- Interstitial atoms in noble metalsPhysics Letters, 1964
- Recovery of Electron-Irradiated Copper. I. Close Pair RecoveryPhysical Review B, 1959
- Recovery of Electron-Irradiated Copper. II. Interstitial MigrationPhysical Review B, 1959
- Mobility of Interstitial Atoms in a Face-Centered MetalPhysical Review B, 1953