EFFICACY OF SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR URINARY RETENTION: RESULTS 18 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 165 (1) , 15-19
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200101000-00004
Abstract
We investigate the efficacy of sacral neurostimulation in patients with idiopathic urinary retention in a prospective, randomized multicenter trial. A total of 177 patients with urinary retention refractory to standard therapy were enrolled in the study. Greater than 50% improvement in baseline voiding symptoms during a 3 to 7-day percutaneous test stimulation qualified a patient for surgical implantation of an InterStim parallel system. Of the patients who qualified for implantation 37 were randomly assigned to a treatment and 31 to a control group. Patients in the treatment group underwent early surgical implantation of the sacral nerve stimulation system, while implantation was delayed in the control group for 6 months. Followup evaluations, including voiding diary analysis and temporary deactivation of the stimulator at 6 months, were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after implantation in the treatment group, and after 3 and 6 months in the control group. Compared to the control group, patients implanted with the InterStim system had statistically and clinically significant reductions in the catheter volume per catheterization (p <0.0001). Of the patients treated with implants 69% eliminated catheterization at 6 months and an additional 14% had a 50% or greater reduction in catheter volume per catheterization. Therefore, successful results were achieved in 83% of the implant group with retention compared to 9% of the control group at 6 months. Temporary inactivation of sacral nerve stimulation therapy resulted in a significant increase in residual volumes (p <0.0001) but effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation was sustained through 18 months after implant. Results of this prospective, randomized clinical study demonstrate that sacral nerve stimulation is effective for restoring voiding in patients with retention who are refractory to other forms of treatment.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- SACRAL NEUROMODULATION IN THE TREATMENT OF URGENCY-FREQUENCY SYMPTOMS: A MULTICENTER STUDY ON EFFICACY AND SAFETYJournal of Urology, 2000
- SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY URINARY URGE INCONTINENCEJournal of Urology, 1999
- Sacral Root Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Various Voiding and Storage ProblemsInternational Urogynecology Journal, 1999
- Neural Stimulation for Chronic Voiding DysfunctionsJournal of Urology, 1994
- Restoration of voiding in chronic urinary retention using the neuroprosthesisWorld Journal of Urology, 1991
- Neuromodulation of voiding dysfunction and pelvic painWorld Journal of Urology, 1991
- Functional evaluation of sacralnerve root integrityUrology, 1990
- Electrical Stimulation in the Clinical Management of the Neurogenic BladderJournal of Urology, 1988
- Advances in Genitourinary NeurostimulationNeurosurgery, 1986
- The Neurophysiological Basis of Bladder Inhibition in Response to Intravaginal Electrical StimulationJournal of Urology, 1983