The use of chlorhexidine mouthwash compared with a periodontal dressing following the gingivectomy procedure
- 1 March 1976
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Vol. 3 (1) , 59-65
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1976.tb01851.x
Abstract
The clinical results achieved were compared when a group of 21 patients requiring gingivectomies in comparable bilateral segments received a dressing or a chlorhexidine mouthwash during the first post‐operative week. Initial pre‐operative conditions were comparable. In each of the two treatments highly significant reductions in pocket depths were achieved; the sizes of the reductions were of clinical significance (> 1.5 mm). The observed difference (0.16 mm) between the two treatments in favour of the mouthwash, although significant at the conventional 5 % level, was clinically unimportant. More patients preferred the dressing as a post‐operative treatment, and the clinical implications of the patients' preferences are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Chlorhexidine-containing Methacrylic Gel as a Periodontal DressingThe Journal of Periodontology, 1975
- Dressing after reverse bevel flap proceduresJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1974
- Effect of a Chlorhexidine Dressing on the Healing After Periodontal SurgeryThe Journal of Periodontology, 1974
- The effect of two dressings on the flora of periodontal surgical woundsOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1972
- Effects of Inflammation on Wound RepairJournal of Dental Research, 1971
- The effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinses on the human oral floraJournal of Periodontal Research, 1970
- Periodontal DressingsDental Clinics of North America, 1969
- Tissue reaction to gingivectomy packOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1957
- Inharmonious Cusp Relation as a Factor in PeriodontoclasiaThe Journal of the American Dental Association (1922), 1923