Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Can We Trust the Third Significant Figure?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Mathematical Statistics in Statistical Science
- Vol. 23 (2) , 250-260
- https://doi.org/10.1214/08-sts257
Abstract
Current reporting of results based on Markov chain Monte Carlo computations could be improved. In particular, a measure of the accuracy of the resulting estimates is rarely reported. Thus we have little ability to objectively assess the quality of the reported estimates. We address this issue in that we discuss why Monte Carlo standard errors are important, how they can be easily calculated in Markov chain Monte Carlo and how they can be used to decide when to stop the simulation. We compare their use to a popular alternative in the context of two examples.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Possible biases induced by mcmc convergence diagnosticsJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1999
- R: A Language for Data Analysis and GraphicsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 1996
- Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Diagnostics: A Comparative ReviewJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Annealing Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications to Ancestral InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Minorization Conditions and Convergence Rates for Markov Chain Monte CarloJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior DistributionsThe Annals of Statistics, 1994
- [Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo]: RejoinderStatistical Science, 1992
- Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple SequencesStatistical Science, 1992
- Estimating the asymptotic variance with batch meansOperations Research Letters, 1991
- The Reporting of Computation-Based Results in StatisticsThe American Statistician, 1975