Abstract
Current theories on the origin of galactic rotation postulate widely different initial conditions. The assumed initial conditions consist of either density inhomogeneities or spin inhomogeneities, or more generally a combination of both. When the density contrast $$\mu \,=\,\delta \,\rho /\rho$$ increases the Universe is said to be gravitationally unstable; in a similar fashion, when the ‘spin contrast’ $$\xi \,=\,\omega^2/4\pi G\rho$$ increases (where ω is angular velocity) the Universe can be said to be spin unstable. In the tidal theory it is supposed that ξ is initially zero, and that density fluctuations grow because of gravitational instability and then interact to produce galactic spin. In the vortex theory it is supposed that μ is initially zero, and that spin fluctuations grow because of spin instability and form into galactic eddies characterized by a spin contrast of $$\xi \,\sim\,1$$ . These cosmogonies are discussed and it is shown that they both encounter difficulties. In particular, they are apparently unable to account for the basic difference between elliptical and spiral systems. A more general cosmogony is then discussed, which takes a less extreme view of the initial state, and starts from initial conditions consisting of both density and spin inhomogeneities. It is argued that when μ and ξ have initially comparable values, as in the case of the spinning-core theory, the main difficulties inherent in the previous theories are avoided. It is shown in an Appendix that the rotationally induced anisotropy in the expansion is of order ξ .

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: