GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:

• Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews
  BMJ, 2009
• Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
  The Lancet, 2009
• Comparing non-vertebral fracture risk reduction with osteoporosis therapies: looking beneath the surface
  Osteoporosis International, 2008
• Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in advanced breast cancer.
  International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2008
• Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin vs Unfractionated Heparin for Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With CancerA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2008
• WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus
  Published by Elsevier ,2007
• Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence
  BMJ, 2005
• Atorvastatin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Hemodialysis
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
• External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”
  The Lancet, 2005
• Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgery
  BMJ, 2003