Differential Encoding of Losses and Gains in the Human Striatum
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 27 (18) , 4826-4831
- https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0400-07.2007
Abstract
Studies on human monetary prediction and decision making emphasize the role of the striatum in encoding prediction errors for financial reward. However, less is known about how the brain encodes financial loss. Using Pavlovian conditioning of visual cues to outcomes that simultaneously incorporate the chance of financial reward and loss, we show that striatal activation reflects positively signed prediction errors for both. Furthermore, we show functional segregation within the striatum, with more anterior regions showing relative selectivity for rewards and more posterior regions for losses. These findings mirror the anteroposterior valence-specific gradient reported in rodents and endorse the role of the striatum in aversive motivational learning about financial losses, illustrating functional and anatomical consistencies with primary aversive outcomes such as pain.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under RiskScience, 2007
- Neural Predictors of PurchasesPublished by Elsevier ,2007
- Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humansNature, 2006
- Opponent appetitive-aversive neural processes underlie predictive learning of pain reliefNature Neuroscience, 2005
- Dopamine, learning and motivationNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004
- Discrete Coding of Reward Probability and Uncertainty by Dopamine NeuronsScience, 2003
- Metalearning and neuromodulationNeural Networks, 2002
- Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI ExperimentsNeuroImage, 1998
- A Neural Substrate of Prediction and RewardScience, 1997
- Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.Psychological Review, 1981