NATURAL SELECTION ON FLORAL TRAITS IN TWO SPECIES OFLOBELIAWITH DIFFERENT POLLINATORS
- 1 September 1991
- Vol. 45 (6) , 1468-1479
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02649.x
Abstract
Using both multivariate and univariate regression techniques, I measured selection acting through female reproductive success in two hermaphroditic species with precise pollen placement but different pollinators: hummingbird-pollinated Lobelia cardinalis and bumblebee-pollinated L. siphilitica. Six traits were analyzed in two populations of L. cardinalis and one population of L. siphilitica: flower number, mean number of flowers open per day, inflorescence height, number of days in flower, median-flower date and nectar-stigma distance. In another study it was found that female reproductive success in one population of L. cardinalis was much less pollen limited than in the other two populations, and it was therefore expected that selection of female reproductive traits in this population would be weaker. In the univariate analyses correlations caused nearly all traits to have significant directional selection coefficients. However, in the multivariate analyses no traits in L. siphilitica experienced directional or quadratic selection. Selection acted differently in the two L. cardinalis populations. The less pollen-limited population experienced positive directional selection on flower number and median-flower date, while in the other L. cardinalis population there was positive directional selection on flower number and nectar-stigma distance and both positive directional and positive quadratic selection on height. The functional significance of floral traits in these two species and the probable effect of increased sample sizes are discussed.Keywords
Funding Information
- Sigma Xi
- University of Chicago
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pollen Limitation of Female Reproduction in Lobelia Cardinalis and L. SiphiliticaEcology, 1991
- Analysis of phenotypic selection among locations in Impatiens pallida and Impatiens capensisCanadian Journal of Botany, 1990
- The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubesNature, 1988
- Sexual Variations Among Plants of a Perfect-Flowered SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 1987
- Jackknife, Bootstrap and Other Resampling Methods in Regression AnalysisThe Annals of Statistics, 1986
- Regulation of Seed‐Set in Polemonium viscosum: Floral Scents, Pollination, and ResourcesEcology, 1985
- Factors that Influence the Duration of the Staminate and Pistillate Phases of Lobelia cardinalis FlowersBotanical Gazette, 1984
- Morphology, Performance and FitnessAmerican Zoologist, 1983
- Phylogenetic Relationships of Twenty-One Species of Lobelia L. Section LobeliaBulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 1959
- Application of the Darwinian Theory to Flowers and the Insects which Visit ThemThe American Naturalist, 1871