Use of a more general model for bioavailability studies
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Vol. 19 (9) , 3361-3373
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929008830386
Abstract
Use of a multivariate model for bioavailability crossover studies is discussed. The model affords a convenient way to obtain from untransformed data exact confidence intervals and general hypothesis tests for ratios that are pertinent for comparing formulations. Previously, confidence intervals for the case of a two period study of two formulations have been presented. This paper treats the case of three or more formulations in a study in which each subject receives each formulation. The model requires weaker assumptions than the assumptions of other models that have been commonly used. In addition to inferences on ratios, it is pointed out how to obtain from the model tests of the hypotheses of equal formulation effects, equal period effects, and equal sequence effects. The use of these concepts for studies in which a formulation is received more than once by subjects isalso discussed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailabilityJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1987
- An exact confidence interval from untransformed data for the ratio of two formulation meansJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1984
- Comparison of Different Methods for Decision-Making in Bioequivalence AssessmentBiometrics, 1981
- Model building and testing for the change‐over designBiometrical Journal, 1980
- Applications of Multivariate Analysis of Variance to Repeated Measurements ExperimentsBiometrics, 1966
- Some Problems in Interval EstimationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1954