Correlation between the Measures of Impairment, According to the Modified System of the American Medical Association, and Function*
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 80 (7) , 1034-42
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199807000-00012
Abstract
Dical Association, and measurements of task performance based on direct observation as well as the patient's own assessment of activity limitation and disability as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile.The mean residual impairment of the lower extremity according to the Guides was 27 per cent one year after the injury. Only 130 subjects (43 per cent) could perform all five functional tasks without difficulty. Eighty-four subjects (28 per cent) reported functional limitations that resulted in a score on the Sickness Impact Profile that was more than one standard deviation from the preinjury norm for the sample. Impairment ratings according to a modification of the system of the American Medical Association correlated strongly with the performance of functional tasks (r = 0.57) as well as the patients' reported activity limitations as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile (r = 0.55). Correlations were highest when measures of impairment were based on strength rather than on range of motion. The relationship between the impairment rating and function (as observed by an examiner and as reported by the patient) was not influenced by the location of the fracture or the receipt of disability compensation.Our results suggest that the American Medical Association developed a valid approach for the measurement of physical impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity. In our study, the anatomical approach of evaluation based on muscle strength that was described in the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment was the most sensitive measure of impairment compared with the anatomical measure based on range of motion and compared with the functional and diagnostic methods for the rating of impairment. Until the diagnostic and functional approaches for the measurement of musculoskeletal impairment are refined, we recommend use of the anatomical approach when evaluating impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity....Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sickness impact profile: The state of the art of a generic functional status measureSocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- Health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel diseaseDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1989
- Medical disability assessment of the back pain patient for the social security administration: The weighting of presenting clinical featuresJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1987
- Interrater Reliability of Hand-Held DynamometryPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1987
- How Many Days of Bed Rest for Acute Low Back Pain?New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Test-Retest Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry During a Single Session of Strength AssessmentPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1986
- Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls.American Journal of Public Health, 1985
- Measuring Physical and Psychosocial Function in Patients with Low-Back PainSpine, 1983
- Physical and Psychosocial Function in Rheumatoid ArthritisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1982
- The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status MeasureMedical Care, 1981