Persistent improved results after adding vincristine and bleomycin to a cyclophosphamide/hydroxorubicin/Vm-26/prednisone combination (CHVmP) in stage III-IV intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Open Access
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 8 (suppl_1) , S67-S70
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/8.suppl_1.s67
Abstract
CHOP has been and still is regarded by many as the ‘standard’ treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In 1980 the EORTC Lymphoma Cooperative Group started a study to evaluate the addition of vincristine and bleomycin to its standard four-drug combination chemotherapy, CHVmP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxorubicin, Vm-26, prednisone). Eligible patients were stage III or IV, intermediate- to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Working Formulation E-I). One-hundred-eighty-nine patients were entered, of whom 140 were eligible and evaluable. A previous report showed an improved response rate and failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival for the combination CHVmP-VB. At ten years, the outcome still favors the addition of vincristine and bleomycin. The FFS was 34% vs. 23% and the overall survival 34% vs. 22%. This difference was mainly due to a difference in CR rate (74% vs. 49%), Relapse-free survival for patients reaching a CR was the same in both arms. When the patients were grouped according to the International Prognostic Factor Index, no statistically significant difference could be observed in favor of one treatment within either group. This trial clearly demonstrates the benefit gained by the addition of vincristine and bleomycin to ‘standard’ chemotherapy for intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- Randomized comparison of MACOP-B with CHOP in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Australian and New Zealand Lymphoma Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- EORTC study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Phase III study comparing CHVmP-VB and ProMACE-MOPP in patients with stage II, III, and IV intermediate- and high-grade lymphomaAnnals of Oncology, 1994
- A Predictive Model for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of a Standard Regimen (CHOP) with Three Intensive Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of a Second-Generation Combination Chemotherapeutic Regimen (m-BACOD) with a Standard Regimen (CHOP) for Advanced Diffuse Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Superiority of second over first generation chemotherapy in a randomized trial for stage III-IV intermediate and high-grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL): The 1980–1985 EORTC trialAnnals of Oncology, 1991
- Superiority of ProMACE-CytaBOM over ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse aggressive lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- The m-BACOD combination chemotherapy regimen in large-cell lymphoma: analysis of the completed trial and comparison with the M-BACOD regimen.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- ADVANCED DIFFUSE HISTIOCYTIC LYMPHOMA, A POTENTIALLY CURABLE DISEASEThe Lancet, 1975