An Evaluation of the Gram Stain in Protected Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Early Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- critical care-and-trauma
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 92 (2) , 442-447
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200102000-00031
Abstract
Implications We investigated the reliability of direct examination versus quantitative cultures in the early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia using the protected bronchoalveolar lavage in 104 patients. Regarding detection of bacteria using the Gram stain, we found low sensitivity and negative predictive value and high specificity and positive predictive value. We investigated the usefulness and reliability of the Gram stain value versus quantitative cultures in the early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using the protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL). One hundred four mechanically ventilated patients (age = 52 ± 19; SAPS II = 38 ± 15) with a strong suspicion of VAP were consecutively included. One hundred sixteen PBAL were performed and mini-bronchoalveolar lavage were analyzed using the Gram stain standard method and the conventional quantitative culture technique. VAP diagnosis was based on a positive quantitative culture of mini-bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (cutoff ≥ 103 CFU/mL). A final diagnosis of VAP was established in 67 patients and there was no infection in 49 cases. Regarding detection of bacteria using the Gram stain, we found a sensitivity of 76.2%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 75.4%. There was a good agreement with the final diagnosis (kappa statistic 0.73; concordance 86.2%). The degree of qualitative agreement between Gram stain and quantitative cultures was analyzed in the VAP group: the correlation was complete in 39% (26 of 67 VAP), partial in 28% (19 of 67 VAP) and there was no correlation in 33% (22 of 67 VAP). We conclude that despite its overall “good agreement,” the Gram stain is of limited use for the rapid diagnosis of VAP and unreliable for the early adaptation of empirical antimicrobial therapy when using the noninvasive PBAL procedure.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utility of Gram's Stain and Efficacy of Quantitative Cultures for Posttraumatic PneumoniaAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- The Diagnostic Value of Gram Stain of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Samples in Patients with Suspected Ventilator-associated PneumoniaScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated PneumoniaAnesthesiology, 1997
- Impact of BAL Data on the Therapy and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaChest, 1997
- Bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnosing bacterial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Diagnostic value of direct examination of the protected specimen brush in ventilator-associated pneumoniaEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1994
- Microbiological lung surveillance in mechanically ventilated patients, using non-directed bronchial lavage and quantitative cultureQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Comparison of a Plugged Telescoping Catheter with the Protected Specimen BrushAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1991
- Protected Bronchoalveolar Lavage: A New Bronchoscopic Technique to Retrieve Uncontaminated Distal Airway SecretionsAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1991
- A Prospective Study of Protected Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Diagnosis of Nosocomial PneumoniaAnesthesiology, 1989