Policies for study monitoring and interim reporting of results.
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 5 (9) , 1477-1484
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1987.5.9.1477
Abstract
Interim analyses of comparative trials are necessary in order to monitor for extreme therapeutic results. However, closing studies and reporting results whenever "trends" appear increases the probability of a false conclusion to well over the desired .05 level. Guidelines for early stopping of comparative trials must be carefully defined to avoid this problem. In addition, to avoid inappropriate early closure of studies due to declining accrual (as investigators draw their own conclusions from early unreliable data), it is recommended that access to interim data be limited to a multidisciplinary monitoring committee responsible for (1) performing and reviewing interim analyses, and (2) deciding when early termination should be considered. Accrual and reporting of studies from two clinical trials groups, one with a policy of limited access to interim data and one without, are compared. The group without monitoring committees had a higher incidence of accrual and reporting problems than the group with monit...This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Designs for group sequential testsControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- Considerations for monitoring and evaluating treatment effects in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical TrialsPublished by JSTOR ,1979
- Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trialsBiometrika, 1977
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976