The Wonderland of Public Administration Reforms
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organization Studies
- Vol. 10 (4) , 531-548
- https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000404
Abstract
The students of public sector organizations are often surprised by the phenomenon of repetitive, costly and inconclusive reforms, which seem to be an unavoidable part of the public sector landscape. One possible reaction to it is to make a rationalistic critique and then to issue recommendations for improvement. An alternative is to look for a different perspective in analyzing functions of reform. A study of Sub-municipal Committee reform in Swedish municipalities is analyzed in terms of a symbolic accomplishment. In the light of the results, it is somewhat doubtful whether so-called reforms change organizational forms, but they do help to re-shuffle power, achieve a renewed legitimacy, re-socialize organization members and, in general, introduce variety into routines of organizational life.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Control Things with WordsManagement Communication Quarterly, 1988
- Power as an experiential conceptScandinavian Journal of Management, 1988
- An integrative theory of organizational legitimationScandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 1986
- Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about GovernmentAmerican Political Science Review, 1983
- THE IRRATIONALITY OF ACTION AND ACTION RATIONALITY: DECISIONS, IDEOLOGIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONSJournal of Management Studies, 1982
- Footnotes to Organizational ChangeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1981
- Urban Policy and Political LegitimationInternational Political Science Review, 1980
- Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational BehaviorThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1975
- Roles and Symbols in the Determination of State ExpendituresMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1967
- Some Aspects of Civil Service Reorganisation in GreeceInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 1965