PATTERNS OF ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN DIFFERENT FORMS OF TREE COVER IN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES
Open Access
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Applications
- Vol. 16 (5) , 1986-1999
- https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:poadid]2.0.co;2
Abstract
As tropical regions are converted to agriculture, conservation of biodiversity will depend not only on the maintenance of protected forest areas, but also on the scope for conservation within the agricultural matrix in which they are embedded. Tree cover typically retained in agricultural landscapes in the neotropics may provide resources and habitats for animals, but little is known about the extent to which it contributes to conservation of animal species. Here, we explore the animal diversity associated with different forms of tree cover for birds, bats, butterflies, and dung beetles in a pastoral landscape in Nicaragua. We measured species richness and abundance of these four animal taxa in riparian and secondary forest, forest fallows, live fences, and pastures with high and low tree cover. We recorded over 20 000 individuals of 189 species including 14 endangered bird species. Mean abundance and species richness of birds and bats, but not dung beetles or butterflies, were significantly different among forms of tree cover. Species richness of bats and birds was positively correlated with tree species richness. While the greatest numbers of bird species were associated with riparian and secondary forest, forest fallows, and pastures with >15% tree cover, the greatest numbers of bat species were found in live fences and riparian forest. Species assemblages of all animal taxa were different among tree cover types, so that maintaining a diversity of forms of tree cover led to conservation of more animal species in the landscape as a whole. Overall, the findings indicate that retaining tree cover within agricultural landscapes can help conserve animal diversity, but that conservation efforts need to target forms of tree cover that conserve the taxa that are of interest locally. Preventing the degradation of remaining forest fragments is a priority, but encouraging farmers to maintain tree cover in pastures and along boundaries may also make an important contribution to animal conservation.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural regionEcography, 2004
- Differential response of selected taxa to landscape context and agricultural intensificationLandscape and Urban Planning, 2004
- Coverage Provided by the Global Protected-Area System: Is It Enough?BioScience, 2004
- Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- Trees and farming in the dry zone of southern Honduras I: campesino tree husbandry practices.Agroforestry Systems, 2003
- Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical ForestsScience, 2002
- Characterization of multistrata silvopastoral systems on seasonally dry pastures in the Caribbean Region of ColombiaAgroforestry Systems, 2001
- Time Lag between Deforestation and Bird Extinction in Tropical Forest FragmentsConservation Biology, 1999
- BIRDS AND BUTTERFLIES ALONG AN URBAN GRADIENT: SURROGATE TAXA FOR ASSESSING BIODIVERSITY?Ecological Applications, 1999
- Vertebrate diversity, ecology and conservation in neotropical dry forestsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995