Impact of Full Mental Health and Substance Abuse Parity for Children in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 119 (2) , e452-e459
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0673
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program implemented full mental health and substance abuse parity in January 2001. Evaluation of this policy revealed that parity increased adult beneficiaries’ financial protection by lowering mental health and substance abuse out-of-pocket costs for service users in most plans studied but did not increase rates of service use or spending among adult service users. This study examined the effects of full mental health and substance abuse parity for children. METHODS. Employing a quasiexperimental design, we compared children in 7 Federal Employees Health Benefits plans from 1999 to 2002 with children in a matched set of plans that did not have a comparable change in mental health and substance abuse coverage. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we examined the likelihood of child mental health and substance abuse service use, total spending among child service users, and out-of-pocket spending. RESULTS. The apparent increase in the rate of children’s mental health and substance abuse service use after implementation of parity was almost entirely due to secular trends of increased service utilization. Estimates for children’s mental health and substance abuse spending conditional on this service use showed significant decreases in spending per user attributable to parity for 2 plans; spending estimates for the other plans were not statistically significant. Children using these services in 3 of 7 plans experienced statistically significant reductions in out-of-pocket spending attributable to the parity policy, and the average dollar savings was sizeable for users in those 3 plans. In the remaining 4 plans, out-of-pocket spending also decreased, but these decreases were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS. Full mental health and substance abuse parity for children, within the context of managed care, can achieve equivalence of benefits in health insurance coverage and improve financial protection without adversely affecting health care costs but may not expand access for children who need these services.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioral Health Insurance Parity for Federal EmployeesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Interaction terms in logit and probit modelsEconomics Letters, 2003
- Will Parity in Coverage Result in Better Mental Health Care?New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?Journal of Health Economics, 2001
- Benefit limits in managed behavioral health care: Do they matter?The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 1999
- Managed Behavioral Health Services for Children Under Carve-Out ContractsPsychiatric Services, 1998
- Costs And Incentives In A Behavioral Health Carve-OutHealth Affairs, 1998
- How Expensive Is Unlimited Mental Health Care Coverage Under Managed Care?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- How expensive is unlimited mental health care coverage under managed care?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- A New Look At Rising Mental Health Insurance CostsHealth Affairs, 1991