Measuring and modeling facial affect
Open Access
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers
- Vol. 32 (4) , 505-514
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200822
Abstract
In recent years, researchers in computer science and human-computer interaction have become increasingly interested in characterizing perception of facial affect. Ironically, this applied interest comes at a time when the classic findings on perception of human facial affect are being challenged in the psychological research literature, largely on methodological grounds. This paper first describes two experiments that empirically address Russell's methodological criticisms of the classic work on measuring "basic emotions," as well as his alternative approach toward modeling "facial affect space." Finally, a user study on affect in a prototype model of a robot face is reported; these results are compared with the human findings from Experiment 1. This work provides new data on measuring facial affect, while also demonstrating how basic and more applied research can mutually inform one another.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automatic facial expression interpretationSex, Death & Politics, 2000
- Face to interfacePublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2000
- Measuring facial expressions by computer image analysisPsychophysiology, 1999
- The Classification of Facial Expressions of Emotion: A Multidimensional-Scaling ApproachPerception, 1997
- The Psychology of Facial ExpressionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- Affective computingPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1997
- Comic ChatPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1996
- Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1994
- The Expression of the Emotions in Man and AnimalsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1965
- Three dimensions of emotion.Psychological Review, 1954