The control of acute cisplatin-induced emesis – a comparative study of granisetron and a combination regimen of high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone
Open Access
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 68 (1) , 176-180
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1993.309
Abstract
The anti-emetic efficacy and safety of granisetron, a highly selective and potent 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, was compared with that of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in 281 patients due to receive single-day cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 49 mg m-2). In this single-blind, multicentre study, granisetron (40 micrograms kg-1) was administered as a single prophylactic 5-min infusion. Dexamethasone (12 mg) was administered as a 30-min infusion followed by a loading dose of 3 mg kg-1 metoclopramide. A maintenance dose of metoclopramide 4 mg kg-1 was then infused over 8 h. A single prophylactic dose of granisetron was as effective as the combination regimen in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Of 143 granisetron-treated patients, 100 (70%) were complete responders (no vomiting and no or only mild nausea) compared with 93/138 (67%) patients who received the comparator regimen. Twenty-three percent of granisetron-treated patients experienced one of more adverse events compared with 33% of patients in the comparator group. No extrapyramidal reactions were reported in the granisetron group compared with 13 in comparator-treated patients (8%). This difference was significant (P < 0.05). The commonest adverse event in the granisetron group, headache (9.8%) described by the majority of patients as mild, was significantly higher than that reported in the comparator group (3% P = 0.02). Granisetron appears to be a safe and effective agent which can be used as a single agent for the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis. The simplicity of administration, a single 5-min infusion prior to chemotherapy, and the lack of somnolence or extrapyramidal reactions offer clear advantages over the comparator combination regimen.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictive Factors of Delayed Emesis in Cisplatin-Treated Patients and Antiemetic Activity and Tolerability of Metoclopramide or DexamethasoneAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- ANTIEMETIC ACTIVITY OF 2 DIFFERENT HIGH-DOSES OF METOCLOPRAMIDE IN CISPLATIN-TREATED CANCER-PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF THE ITALIAN ONCOLOGY GROUP FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH1985
- Incidence, course, and severity of delayed nausea and vomiting following the administration of high-dose cisplatin.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Development of anticipatory nausea: A prospective analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1985
- The American Academy of Pediatrics Comments on the Baby Doe II RegulationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983
- Prevalence and Correlates of Anticipatory Nausea and Vomiting in Chemotherapy Patients23JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1982
- ANTICIPATORY VOMITING IN WOMEN RECEIVING CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND 5-FU (CMF) ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CARCINOMA1982
- Antiemetic Efficacy of High-Dose Metoclopramide: Randomized Trials with Placebo and Prochlorperazine in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and VomitingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- A controlled double-blind study of trimethobenzamide, prochlorperazine, and placebo.1966