The Confession of an Erstwhile Bureaucrat
- 21 April 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 239 (16) , 1608
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1978.03280430024003
Abstract
To the Editor.— The consequences of a seemingly minor decision may be difficult to foresee. In mid-1962, after noting with dissatisfaction the manner in which the clinical investigation of thalidomide had been conducted in the United States, the then Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare ordered the Food and Drug Administration to develop regulations for investigational drugs. An official in the agency's Bureau of Medicine had, in fact, written a draft of such regulations about two years before, and with moderate revision, these were published as a proposal in theFederal Register. During the process of revision, I was in his office and he asked my opinion about a passage. This involved the obligations of the pharmaceutical industry in investigating a new drug for the purpose of submitting an application to market it. The passage was written in terms of what a manufacturer must do. I noted a potential problemKeywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Vexing DecisionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1975
- A Guide Into Chaos: Resist ItPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1974
- Propranolol ControversyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1974
- Propranolol and LabelingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1973
- Instrument or impediment? The regulatory monograph in medical communicationsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1972