Transcatheter Closure versus Medical Therapy of Patent Foramen Ovale and Presumed Paradoxical Thromboemboli
Top Cited Papers
- 4 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 139 (9) , 753-760
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00010
Abstract
The optimal strategy to prevent recurrent presumed paradoxical emboli in patients with patent foramen ovale is unknown. To synthesize the current knowledge about and qualitatively assess the relative benefits of transcatheter closure versus medical therapy for patent foramen ovale. English-language and foreign-language journals listed in the MEDLINE database from January 1985 to July 2003 were systematically searched. Secondary sources were also used. Secondary prevention studies of transcatheter closure or medical therapy for patent foramen ovale were required to include at least 10 patients followed for more than 1 year and to report recurrent neurologic events. Data from published studies were manually extracted and summarized. Ten studies of transcatheter closure (1355 patients) and 6 studies of medical therapy (895 patients) for patent foramen ovale were included. Overall, the 1-year rate of recurrent neurologic thromboembolism with transcatheter intervention was 0% to 4.9%, and the incidence of major and minor complications was 1.5% and 7.9%, respectively. Medical management was associated with a 1-year recurrence rate of 3.8% to 12.0%. However, limitations resulting from uncontrolled data, nonstandardized definitions, vigilance of follow-up, and baseline imbalances preclude definitive conclusions about the superiority of a particular approach. General differences in study samples included older age, greater proportion of men, and higher prevalence of diabetes and smoking among medically treated patients. Patients undergoing treatment with a transcatheter device were more likely to have had multiple thromboembolic events at baseline. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale may prevent a substantial proportion of cryptogenic strokes. Randomized clinical trials are needed.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism: Intermediate-term risk of recurrent neurological eventsCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2002
- Comparison of frequency of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography in patients with cerebral ischemic events versus in subjects in the general populationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Cost-effectiveness of New Antiplatelet Regimens Used as Secondary Prevention of Stroke or Transient Ischemic AttackArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000
- Preventing stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale: Antithrombotic therapy, foramen closure, or therapeutic abstention? A decision analytic perspectiveAmerican Heart Journal, 1998
- Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale with the buttoned device for prevention of recurrence of paradoxic embolismThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke. A population perspectiveDiabetologia, 1995
- Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Diagnosis of paradoxic embolism by transesophageal echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Incidence and Size of Patent Foramen Ovale During the First 10 Decades of Life: An Autopsy Study of 965 Normal HeartsPublished by Elsevier ,1984