Possible role of firmly bound ATP in the energy transduction of photosynthetic membranes

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Chromatophores of Rhodospirillum rubrum and spinach chloroplasts contain firmly bound ATP that is rapidly labeled along with ADP in the presence of 32Pi and endogenous nucleotides. The labeling is not entirely dependent on light. In chloroplasts three types of bound ATP can be defined methodologically by their extraction properties: buffer‐soluble; acid‐soluble; and SDS‐soluble or firmly bound ATP. Extensive washing of the chloroplasts does reduce buffer‐soluble but not acidsoluble and firmly bound APT. Buffer‐soluble [32P] ATP is almost exclusively γ labeled while acid‐soluble and firmly bound ATP are labeled in the β and γ position equally. CCCP, desaspidin, and phlorizin do not inhibit the labeling of firmly bound ATP, whereas the phosphorylation is almost abolished. However, EDTA and NEM pretreatments of the choloroplasts affect both reactions similarly. The postillumination [32P] ATP synthesis with chromatophores can be inhibited by adding ATP to the incubation mixture after illumination if 32Pi is included only during the dark incubation, but is without effect if 32Pi is present only during illumination. On the other hand, ADP added after illumination inhibits post‐illumination [32P] ATP formation in both chromatophores and chloroplasts only if 32Pi is present during illumination. The data can be explained by a coupling factor having two sites, as proposed previously on the basis that firmly bound ATP does not transfer its phosphoryl group but seems to drive a synthesis of acid‐soluble ATP which incorporates free phosphate (Lutz, H. U., Dahl, J. S., and Bachofen, R.), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 347:359 [1974].