Invited commentary: measurement of quality in surgery: that's our job

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:

• Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures
  Surgery, 2004
• Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?1
  Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
• Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
• The Leapfrog Volume Criteria May Fall Short in Identifying High-Quality Surgical Centers
  Annals of Surgery, 2003
• The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Non-Veterans Administration Hospitals
  Annals of Surgery, 2002
• Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
• The Comparative Assessment and Improvement of Quality of Surgical Care in the Department of Veterans Affairs
  Archives of Surgery, 2002
• Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative
  Surgery, 2001
• Accuracy of Administrative Data in Trauma: Splenic Injuries as an Example
  Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000