Genome Duplications and Accelerated Evolution ofHoxGenes and Cluster Architecture in Teleost Fishes1
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- Published by Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology in American Zoologist
- Vol. 41 (3) , 676-686
- https://doi.org/10.1668/0003-1569(2001)041[0676:gdaaeo]2.0.co;2
Abstract
The early origin of four vertebrate Hox gene clusters during the evolution of gnathostomes was likely caused by two consecutive duplications of the entire genome and the subsequent loss of individual genes. The presumed conserved and important roles of these genes in tetrapods during development led to the general assumption that Hox cluster architecture had remained unchanged since the last common ancestor of all jawed vertebrates. But recent data from teleost fishes reveals that this is not the case. Here, we present an analysis of the evolution of vertebrate Hox genes and clusters, with emphasis on the differences between the Hox A clusters of fish (actinopterygian) and tetrapod (sarcopterygian) lineages. In contrast to the general conservation of genomic architecture and gene sequence observed in sarcopterygians, the evolutionary history of actinopterygian Hox clusters likely includes an additional (third) genome duplication that initially increased the number of clusters from four to eight. We document, for the first time, higher rates of gene loss and gene sequence evolution in the Hox genes of fishes compared to those of land vertebrates. These two observations might suggest that two different molecular evolutionary strategies exist in the two major vertebrate lineages. Preliminary data from the African cichlid fish Oreochromis niloticus compared to those of the pufferfish and zebrafish reveal important differences in Hox cluster architecture among fishes and, together with genetic mapping data from Medaka, indicate that the third genome duplication was not zebrafish-specific, but probably occurred early in the history of fishes. Each descending fish lineage that has been characterized so far, distinctively modified its Hox cluster architecture through independent secondary losses. This variation is related to the large body plan differences observed among fishes, such as the loss of entire sets of appendages and ribs in some lineages.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hox gene duplication in fishSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 1999
- Hox Gene Complexity in Medaka Fish May Be Similar to That in Pufferfish Rather Than ZebrafishBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1999
- Genomic organization of theHoxa4-Hoxa10 region fromMorone saxatilis: Implications forHox gene evolution among vertebratesJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1999
- Vertebrate genomics: More fishy tales about Hox genesCurrent Biology, 1999
- Organization of the Fugu rubripes Hox clusters: evidence for continuing evolution of vertebrate Hox complexesNature Genetics, 1997
- The ancestry of segmentationNature, 1997
- Evidence for Four Hox Clusters in the KillifishFundulus heteroclitus(Teleostei)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996
- PCR-survey of hox-genes of the zebrafish: New sequence information and evolutionary implicationsJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1996
- The zootype and the phylotypic stageNature, 1993
- Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoideaJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1989