FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING DURING LABOUR—TOO FREQUENT INTERVENTION, TOO LITTLE BENEFIT?
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 330 (8572) , 1375-1377
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91266-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Obstetrician's DilemmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- A Prospective Comparison of Selective and Universal Electronic Fetal Monitoring in 34,995 PregnanciesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.BMJ, 1983
- A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric populationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981
- A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979
- An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978
- A comparison of two controlled trials concerning the efficacy of fetal intensive carejpme, 1978
- Controlled trial of fetal intensive careAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1976
- The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1976