The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (1) , 28-36
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approachQuality of Life Research, 2006
- The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity ScaleThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2006
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status MeasuresPharmacoEconomics, 1999
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986