The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:

• Dash and Boston Questionnaire Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Outcome: What is the Responsiveness of an Outcome Questionnaire?
  Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 2004
• Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release
  The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2003
• Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
  Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 2002
• A taxonomy for responsiveness
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
• Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: When are they meaningful?
  The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2001
• Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome: Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients
  Acta Orthopaedica, 1998
• The minimal important difference: Who's to say what is important?
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
• Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: The relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures
  The Journal of Hand Surgery, 1996
• A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.
  Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
• A self-administered hand diagram for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
  The Journal of Hand Surgery, 1990