Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 May 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Oryx
- Vol. 47 (3) , 369-380
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s003060531200172x
Abstract
Biodiversity offsets are an increasingly popular yet controversial tool in conservation. Their popularity lies in their potential to meet the objectives of biodiversity conservation and of economic development in tandem; the controversy lies in the need to accept ecological losses in return for uncertain gains. The offsetting approach is being widely adopted, even though its methodologies and the overriding conceptual framework are still under development. This review of biodiversity offsetting evaluates implementation to date and synthesizes outstanding theoretical and practical problems. We begin by outlining the criteria that make biodiversity offsets unique and then explore the suite of conceptual challenges arising from these criteria and indicate potential design solutions. We find that biodiversity offset schemes have been inconsistent in meeting conservation objectives because of the challenge of ensuring full compliance and effective monitoring and because of conceptual flaws in the approach itself. Evidence to support this conclusion comes primarily from developed countries, although offsets are increasingly being implemented in the developing world. We are at a critical stage: biodiversity offsets risk becoming responses to immediate development and conservation needs without an overriding conceptual framework to provide guidance and evaluation criteria. We clarify the meaning of the term biodiversity offset and propose a framework that integrates the consideration of theoretical and practical challenges in the offset process. We also propose a research agenda for specific topics around metrics, baselines and uncertainty.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and servicesJournal of Applied Ecology, 2011
- A Conceptual Analysis of the Application of Tradable Permits to Biodiversity ConservationConservation Biology, 2010
- When do conservation planning methods deliver? Quantifying the consequences of uncertaintyEcological Informatics, 2009
- Development by design: blending landscape‐level planning with the mitigation hierarchyFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009
- Why bartering biodiversity failsConservation Letters, 2009
- A Framework for Implementing Biodiversity Offsets: Selecting Sites and Determining ScaleBioScience, 2009
- BioBanking: an environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservationBiodiversity and Conservation, 2008
- Compensatory mitigation as a solution to fisheries bycatch–biodiversity conservation conflictsFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007
- MEASURING BIODIVERSITY VALUE FOR CONSERVATIONAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1995
- Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut (USA)Wetlands Ecology and Management, 1992