Comparison of Two Strategies for Collecting Q-Sort Data
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 47 (2) , 547-551
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1980.47.2.547
Abstract
Factor analysis is frequently a useful research methodology, particularly when it is applied in validity studies or as a prelude to various analysis of variance procedures and their analogues. This study compared two strategies for implementing one factor analytic technique, Q-technique factor analysis. The results suggest that the data-collection strategy which is employed can dramatically affect results. It is argued that a mediated-ranking procedure should be preferred over a conventional-sorting procedure because the data should be more reliable.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- How teachers perceive similarities and differences among various teaching modelsJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1980
- Validity of an Evaluator TypologyEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
- A Method for Validating Semantic Differential ReferentsThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
- Policy Analysts in the BureaucracyPublished by University of California Press ,1976
- Strategy for a priori Selection of Judges in a Product-Centered Approach to Assessment of CreativityPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1976
- Relating Factors Between Studies Based Upon Different IndividualsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1971
- Attitudes Toward Education and Perception of Teacher BehaviorsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1968
- Discrimination and reliability in Q-sort personality descriptions.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956