Interpretation of geometric phase via geometric distance and length during cyclic evolution
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 47 (1) , 98-104
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.47.98
Abstract
We cast the nonadiabatic geometric phase in terms of the geometric distance function and the geometric length of the curve for arbitrary cyclic evolution of the quantum states. An interpretation is given to the geometric phase as the value of the integral of the contracted length of the curve along which the system traverses. It is found that for arbitrary cyclic evolution of the quantum states the geometric phase β(C) acquired by the system cannot be greater than the total length of the curve l(C). We have argued that the geometric phase arises because of the fundamental inequality between the length of the curve and the distance function. Finally, we have illustrated the calculation of the geometric phase based on the geometric distance function and the geometric length of the curve.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- General Setting for Berry's PhasePhysical Review Letters, 1988
- THREE ELABORATIONS ON BERRY’S CONNECTION, CURVATURE AND PHASEInternational Journal of Modern Physics A, 1988
- Geometrical Phases from Global Gauge Invariance of Nonlinear Classical Field TheoriesPhysical Review Letters, 1988
- Berry’s geometrical phase and the sequence of states in the Jahn-Teller effectPhysical Review Letters, 1987
- Realizations of Magnetic-Monopole Gauge Fields: Diatoms and Spin PrecessionPhysical Review Letters, 1986
- Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical SystemsPhysical Review Letters, 1984
- Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1984
- Holonomy, the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, and Berry's PhasePhysical Review Letters, 1983
- Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic PotentialPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- On the determination of Born–Oppenheimer nuclear motion wave functions including complications due to conical intersections and identical nucleiThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1979