Natural History of Posterior Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donation for Spinal Surgery
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 26 (13) , 1473-1476
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200107010-00018
Abstract
A prospective study was conducted to examine bone graft donor site morbidity in 106 consecutive patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion. To perform a prospective analysis of donor site morbidity, to document the incidence of major complications, and to collect information on the impact of autologous bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest on the overall outcome of spinal surgery. Bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion is a source of significant morbidity. Previous retrospective case studies indicate that minor complications are common, but they do not define the natural history and complications of posterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting. A standardized harvesting technique was used. At 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the patients completed a proforma questionnaire rating symptoms on a visual analog scale and underwent a postoperative examination by the surgeon. Finally, overall surgical outcome was assessed at 12 months. The major component of morbidity is donor site pain. Mean pain scores were 1.640 at 3 months, 1.812 at 6 months, and 1.207 at 12 months. The pain at 12 months was significantly less than at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.005), with a trend toward the highest scores at 6 months. A pain score of 0 was reported by 55% of the patients. Local sensory loss was found in 10% of the patients. Outcome assessment showed significant differences in morbidity for surgery performed at different spinal levels (P = 0.001), with lumbosacral surgery resulting in worse outcomes than either cervical (P < 0.05) or thoracolumbar (P < 0.05) surgery. Significantly higher visual analog scores were observed at 6 months in patients with poorer overall outcomes. According to this study, it is reasonable to reassure patients that a good result from spinal surgery will not be compromised by severe symptoms or major morbidity secondary to posterior iliac crest bone graft donation. Before surgery, patients may be advised concerning the risks of donor site pain, which improves significantly by 12 months, local tenderness, and uncommonly localized sensory loss.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Procurement of Bone Graft from the Iliac Crest. An Operative Approach with Decreased Morbidity*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1997
- Complications of Iliac Crest Bone Graft HarvestingClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- Biomechanical Analysis of Hemipelvic Deformation After Corticospongious Bone Graft Harvest From the Posterior Iliac CrestSpine, 1996
- Superior Gluteal Artery Injury Secondary to Posterior Iliac Crest Bone Graft HarvestingSpine, 1996
- Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site MorbiditySpine, 1995
- A Prospective Analysis of Autograft Versus Allograft in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in the Same PatientSpine, 1994
- Allograft versus autograft in spinal surgeryCurrent Orthopaedic Practice, 1993
- Chronic Donor Site Pain Complicating Bone Graft Harvesting From the Posterior Iliac Crest for Spinal FusionSpine, 1992
- Harvesting Autogenous Iliac Bone GraftsSpine, 1989
- Morbidity at Bone Graft Donor SitesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1989