Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 19 (2) , 187-203
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x
Abstract
This paper concerns the combination of experts' probability distributions in risk analysis, discussing a variety of combination methods and attempting to highlight the important conceptual and practical issues to be considered in designing a combination process in practice. The role of experts is important because their judgments can provide valuable information, particularly in view of the limited availability of “hard data” regarding many important uncertainties in risk analysis. Because uncertainties are represented in terms of probability distributions in probabilistic risk analysis (PRA), we consider expert information in terms of probability distributions. The motivation for the use of multiple experts is simply the desire to obtain as much information as possible. Combining experts' probability distributions summarizes the accumulated information for risk analysts and decision‐makers. Procedures for combining probability distributions are often compartmentalized as mathematical aggregation methods or behavioral approaches, and we discuss both categories. However, an overall aggregation process could involve both mathematical and behavioral aspects, and no single process is best in all circumstances. An understanding of the pros and cons of different methods and the key issues to consider is valuable in the design of acombination process for a specific PRA. The output, a ”combined probabilitydistribution,” can ideally be viewed as representing a summary of the current state of expert opinion regarding the uncertainty of interest.Keywords
This publication has 94 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling Expert Opinion Arising as a Partial Probabilistic SpecificationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Improving the Accuracy of Group Judgment: A Process Intervention Combining Group Facilitation, Social Judgment Analysis, and Information TechnologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- Some approximations useful to the use of dependent information sourcesReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1993
- Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950–1990Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision makingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- Uncertainties in system analysis: Probabilistic versus nonprobabilistic theoriesReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1990
- Structuring knowledge retrieval: An analysis of decomposed quantitative judgmentsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1988
- A critique of current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessmentReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1988
- Individual versus group use of base-rate and individuating informationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- Normal Bayesian DialoguesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979