Knife-Edge or Plateau: When Do Market Models Tip?
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 118 (4) , 1249-1278
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552793
Abstract
This paper studies whether agents must agglomerate at a single location in a class of models of two-sided interaction. In these models there is an increasing returns effect that favors agglomeration, but also a crowding or market-impact effect that makes agents prefer to be in a market with fewer agents of their own type. We show that such models do not tip in the way the term is commonly used. Instead, they have a broad plateau of equilibria with two active markets, and tipping occurs only when one market is below a critical size threshold. Our assumptions are fairly weak, and are satisfied in Krugman's model of labor market pooling, a heterogeneous-agent version of Pagano's asset market model, and Ellison, Fudenberg, and Möbius' model of competing auctions.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic ProcessThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002
- Competing AuctionsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Increasing Returns and Economic GeographyJournal of Political Economy, 1991
- Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under UncertaintyEconometrica, 1989
- Trading Volume and Asset LiquidityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989
- A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomerationRegional Science and Urban Economics, 1988