The Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey is responsive, reliable, and valid
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 58 (6) , 609-617
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.019
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- How Should the Minimum Important Difference for a Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instrument Be Estimated?Medical Care, 2001
- Respiratory Tract Infections as a Public Health ChallengeClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of the Common ColdAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1997
- The minimal important difference: Who's to say what is important?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniquesPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- The influence of signal variation, bias, noise and effect size on statistical significance in treatment studies of the common coldAntiviral Research, 1996
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989