Transparent Development of the WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines
Open Access
- 29 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 4 (5) , e119
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040119
Abstract
Emerging health problems require rapid advice. We describe the development and pilot testing of a systematic, transparent approach used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop rapid advice guidelines in response to requests from member states confronted with uncertainty about the pharmacological management of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection. We first searched for systematic reviews of randomized trials of treatment and prevention of seasonal influenza and for non-trial evidence on H5N1 infection, including case reports and animal and in vitro studies. A panel of clinical experts, clinicians with experience in treating patients with H5N1, influenza researchers, and methodologists was convened for a two-day meeting. Panel members reviewed the evidence prior to the meeting and agreed on the process. It took one month to put together a team to prepare the evidence profiles (i.e., summaries of the evidence on important clinical and policy questions), and it took the team only five weeks to prepare and revise the evidence profiles and to prepare draft guidelines prior to the panel meeting. A draft manuscript for publication was prepared within 10 days following the panel meeting. Strengths of the process include its transparency and the short amount of time used to prepare these WHO guidelines. The process could be improved by shortening the time required to commission evidence profiles. Further development is needed to facilitate stakeholder involvement, and evaluate and ensure the guideline's usefulness.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introductionHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2006
- Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methodsBMJ, 2005
- Critics slam draft WHO report on homoeopathyThe Lancet, 2005
- Methodology for Guideline Development for the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic TherapyChest, 2004
- 25 years of the WHO essential medicines lists: progress and challengesThe Lancet, 2003
- WHO: the casualties and compromises of renewalThe Lancet, 2002
- Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisalThe Lancet, 2000
- Are Guidelines Following Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational studyBMJ, 1998
- Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developmentsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1990