TIME OF APPLICATION AND SOURCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER ON YIELD, QUALITY, NITROGEN RECOVERY, AND NET RETURNS FOR DRYLAND FORAGE GRASSES
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Plant Science
- Vol. 66 (4) , 915-931
- https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps86-114
Abstract
Studies were conducted in Saskatchewan for 4 yr at Swift Current (Brown soil zone) and 3 yr at Scott (Dark Brown soil zone) to assess the effect of time of application and source of N fertilizer on grass forage yields and N and P content, fertilizer N recovery and net returns. A single rate of N, 50 kg ha−1 was applied to established forage stands at three dates during the late fall to early winter period and one or two dates during the early spring period. Six grass species were grown at Swift Current and one at Scott. At Swift Current there were significant differences in dry matter yields between grass species but no species × fertilizer interactions. Fertilizer applied in April generally gave the highest forage yields and N concentration, N recovery, and net returns, but sometimes October and/or November applications provided as good or better results. At Swift Current relative yields (averaged over grass species and source of N) for the different application dates were: April, 158; late October, 154; late November, 145; and late December, 137; with the unfertilized control given a value of 100. At Scott, a similar rating of yields gave: mid-April, 225; mid-October, 219; mid-November, 216; mid-December, 213; and mid-March, 192. Nitrogen concentration in forages averaged 2.06% at Swift Current and 1.53% at Scott, and was mainly affected (increased) by the April fertilizer application date. Yields were 11–13% greater when ammonium nitrate was used compared to when urea was used. Because the N was broadcast and yields were small, recoveries of N by the crop were low, variable due to weather, and averaged 21% at both sites. In most years N fertilizer increased yields, but net returns varied depending on the occurrence of early spring precipitation and on whether the forage was sold for hay or fed on the farm. Fertilization was profitable in the wetter years, but in dry years money was lost irrespective of the N source or site. Net returns favored the ammonium nitrate source of N.Key words: Grass species, grass yield, urea, ammonium nitrate, net returnsThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nitrogen‐ and Water‐Use Efficiency of Several Cool‐Season Grasses Receiving Ammonium Nitrate for 9 Years 1Agronomy Journal, 1985
- Nitrogen-15 Recovery for Five Years after Application of Ammonium Nitrate to Crested WheatgrassSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1984
- Laboratory study of transformation and recovery of urea-N in three Queensland soilsSoil Research, 1984
- Recovery of Nitrogen and Phosphorus after 17 Years from Various Fertilizer Materials Applied to Crested Wheatgrass1Agronomy Journal, 1983
- Field Study of the Fate of Fall‐Applied 15N‐Labelled Fertilizers in Three Alberta Soils1Agronomy Journal, 1983
- Response of Semiarid Grassland Sites to Nitrogen Fertilization: II. Fertilizer RecoverySoil Science Society of America Journal, 1980
- Time of Fertilizer Application on Desert GrasslandsJournal of Range Management, 1968
- Bromegrass Response to Rate and Source of Nitrogen Applied in Fall and Spring in Alaska1Agronomy Journal, 1963