THE OPERANT CONDITIONING OF RESPONSE VARIABILITY: FREE‐OPERANT VERSUS DISCRETE‐RESPONSE PROCEDURES
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 47 (3) , 273-277
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.47-273
Abstract
The operant conditioning of response variability under free‐operant and discrete‐response procedures was investigated. Two pigeons received food only if their pattern of four pecks on two response keys differed from the patterns emitted on the two immediately preceding trials. Under the free‐operant procedure, the keys remained illuminated and operative throughout each trial. There was little variability in the response patterns that resulted, and the pigeons received fewer than one third of the available reinforcers. Under the discrete‐response procedure, a brief timeout period followed each response. Variability increased under this procedure, and the pigeons obtained three fourths of the available reinforcers. Previous successes and failures to produce response variability may have been due to the use or failure to use, respectively, a discrete‐response procedure. Respondent effects inherent in the free‐operant procedure may encourage the development of response stereotypy and, in turn, prevent the development of response variability.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variability is an operant.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1985
- FAILURE TO PRODUCE RESPONSE VARIABILITY WITH REINFORCEMENTJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982
- DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX, STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR IN PIGEONSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1980
- AUTO‐MAINTENANCE IN THE PIGEON: SUSTAINED PECKING DESPITE CONTINGENT NON‐REINFORCEMENT2Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969