Clinical and pathologic tumor size in renal cell carcinoma: difference, correlation, and analysis of the influencing factors
- 31 July 2002
- Vol. 60 (1) , 33-38
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01668-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic assessment of nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: a clinically based modelUrology, 2001
- Radiographic versus pathologic size of renal tumors: implications for partial nephrectomyUrology, 2001
- REEVALUATION OF THE 1997 TNM CLASSIFICATION FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: T1 AND T2 CUTOFF POINT AT 4.5 RATHER THAN 7 CM. BETTER CORRELATES WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMEJournal of Urology, 2001
- THE IMPACT OF A 4 CM. CUTOFF POINT FOR STRATIFICATION OF T1N0M0 RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AFTER RADICAL NEPHRECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- PERCUTANEOUS RENAL TUMOR CRYOABLATION WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING GUIDANCEJournal of Urology, 2001
- Renal tumor size: comparison between computed tomography and surgical measurements.European Urology, 2001
- Radiographic vs surgical size of renal tumours after partial nephrectomyBJU International, 2000
- NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY FOR LOCALIZED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: IMPACT OF TUMOR SIZE ON PATIENT SURVIVAL, TUMOR RECURRENCE AND TNM STAGINGJournal of Urology, 1999
- TNM staging of renal cell carcinomaCancer, 1997
- Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation.Radiology, 1996