Do interventions that improve immunisation uptake also reduce social inequalities in uptake?
- 30 April 1994
- Vol. 308 (6937) , 1142-1144
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1142
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether an intervention designed to improve overall immunisation uptake affected social inequalities in uptake. Design: Cross-sectional small area analyses measuring immunisation uptake in cohorts of children before and after intervention. Small areas classified into five groups, from most deprived to most affluent, with Townsend deprivation score of census enumeration districts. Setting: County of Northumberland. Subjects--All children born in county in four birth cohorts (1981-2, 1985-6, 1987-8, and 1990-1) and still resident at time of analysis. Main outcome measures: Overall uptake in each cohort of pertussis, diphtheria, and measles immunisation, difference in uptake between most deprived and most affluent areas, and odds ratio of uptake between deprived and affluent areas. Results: Coverage for pertussis immunisation rose from 53.4% in first cohort to 91.1% in final cohort. Coverage in the most deprived areas was lower than in the most affluent areas by 4.7%, 8.7%, 10.2%, and 7.0% respectively in successive cohorts, corresponding to an increase in odds ratio of uptake between deprived and affluent areas from 1.2 to 1.6 to 1.9 to 2.3. Coverage for diphtheria immunisation rose from 70.0% to 93.8%; differences between deprived and affluent areas changed from 8.6% to 8.3% to 9.0% to 5.5%, corresponding to odds ratios of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 2.6. Coverage for measles immunisation rose from 52.5% to 91.4%; differences between deprived and affluent areas changed from 9.1% to 5.7% to 8.2% to 3.6%, corresponding to odds ratios of 1.4, 1.4, 1.7, and 1.5. Conclusion--Despite substantial increase in immunisation uptake, inequalities between deprived and affluent areas persisted or became wider. Any reduction in inequality occurred only after uptake in affluent areas approached 95%. Interventions that improve overall uptake of preventive measures are unlikely to reduce social inequalities in uptake.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the measurement of inequalities in healthPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Do inaccuracies in small area deprivation analyses matter?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1993
- Equity and community child health.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1993
- Low immunization uptake rates in an inner-city health district: fact or fiction?Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1991
- What can be done about inequalities in health?The Lancet, 1991
- Health surveillance of preschool children: four years' experience.BMJ, 1990
- Immunisation: causes of failure and strategies and tactics for success.BMJ, 1989
- IMMUNISATION AND GENERAL PRACTICEThe Lancet, 1989
- Measuring severity of injuries to children from home accidents.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1988
- Narrowing the health gap between a deprived and an endowed communityBMJ, 1988