Cross-National Differences in Policy Implementation
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 15 (1) , 103-119
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9101500106
Abstract
Existing research comparing regulatory processes for environmental and health hazards in Europe and North America indicates that there are considerable differences in the ways that countries with quite similar legal and political traditions approach both the scientific evidence on which policy is made and the frameworks that are used to implement such policy. Such differences may be even more extreme between countries with vastly different cultures and political traditions. This article describes and accounts for such differences in political, legislative, administrative, regulatory, and judicial systems that may present obstacles to reaching international accord.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Decline of Deference: The Political Context of Risk CommunicationRisk Analysis, 1989
- Certainty and the Public Understanding of Science: Science on Television1Social Studies of Science, 1987
- Europe Splits Over Gene RegulationScience, 1987
- The Social and Cultural Construction of RiskPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- “The Public” Vs. “The Experts”: Perceived Vs. Actual Disagreements About Risks of Nuclear PowerPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Carcinogenic Risk Assessment in the United States and Great Britain: The Case of Aldrin/DieldrinSocial Studies of Science, 1979
- The Civic CulturePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1963