Factors affecting the interpretation of figurative language uses
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Reading Research and Instruction
- Vol. 25 (2) , 80-90
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19388078609557864
Abstract
This study examined the relations among three general language competency factors ‐ word knowledge, comprehension, and paradigmatic/syntagmatic reasoning ‐ and college developmental readers’ ability to interpret two text formats designed to elicit either a literal or figurative interpretation. The two formats were: a) an embedded format where different target expressions were included as the last statement in a context that supported either a literal or figurative interpretation, and b) an extension format in which subjects were asked to complete a passage with either a literal or figurative expression that they perceived as the most logical extension of what was written. The results indicated that word knowledge was related to the ability to interpret figurative expressions in the embedded format while paradigmatic/syntagmatic reasoning was related to the ability to interpret literal expressions in the extension format. The authors conclude with a discussion of the effects of training in specific language competencies on other verbal skills.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Subschemata on Metaphorical ProcessingReading Research Quarterly, 1982
- Some Issues in the Measurement of Children's Comprehension of Metaphorical LanguageChild Development, 1980
- Beyond literal similarity.Psychological Review, 1979
- Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Categorization of Paradigmatic Syntagmatic Oral ResponsesJournal of Reading Behavior, 1972